HOLLYWOOD, CA – An actress not seen by most moviegoers since at least 2008 is having a difficult time justifying the fact that she appears to have aged during those 6 years.
Critics have rightly pointed out that she has more wrinkles, crow’s feet at the eyes, and her eyesight is even slightly worse, despite maintaining a healthy figure. The actress struggled but could not produce a valid explanation as to why she appears to have gotten older during that period.
Pictures from today were also compared with still shots from 2001’s “Bridget Jones’s Diary” and 1996’s “Jerry Maguire” and it is quite certain that some definite aging has taken place. The actress does appear by all counts to have been much younger in those films than she looks today.
Skilled investigative reporters will continue their probing questions in the hopes that the answer to the unexplained aging can be determined, and more importantly they intend to figure out why the actress allowed this to happen.
This is investigative journalism at its finest. After all, the rest of us are expected to have a reason for looking so bad, why should a Hollywood celebrity be allowed to age with no discernible reason? Well, except time….there is that. Keep up the good work, Sherlock.