The velocity of penguin poop and other important scientific studies | HumorOutcasts

The velocity of penguin poop and other important scientific studies

January 4, 2017
By

Sometimes I can understand why people deny climate change or believe in intelligent design.

Well, not really…I just wanted to reel you in with a little empathy. But the truth is, when you read about some of the batshit crazy stuff that supposedly legitimate scientists spend time and money studying, well, it does make you wonder where their heads are.

For example:

Average pee time doesn’t change with body size

According to a study published in the May 2014 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), scientists have shown it takes mammals about 21 seconds to pee—plus or minus 13 seconds—regardless of their body size. The researchers determined this after watching videos of animals peeing at the Atlanta zoo. Their findings “reveal that the urethra is a flow-enhancing device, enabling the urinary system to be scaled up by a factor of 3,600 in volume without compromising its function.” Yeah, tell that to a guy with an enlarged prostate.

Penguins poop with 4 times more velocity than humans

In the apparent universal quest to understand animals’ elimination habits, scientists at Germany’s International University Bremen observed that penguins forcibly expel their poop away from them, a skill that likely helps keep their nest clean. Intrigued by this fecal phenomenon, the researchers sought to measure just how much force it took to do so (yeah, that would keep me up at night, too). They concluded that the birds blast their BMs with about 4 times the pressure of a human, and can shoot it up to 40 cm (about 15 inches) away from their body. They also noted, “Whether a bird chooses the direction into which it decides to expel its feces, and what role the wind plays in this, remain unknown.” I smell a follow-up study…

Chickens walk like dinosaurs when you put a stick on their butt

According to scientific evidence, birds evolved from dinosaurs. A lot of dinosaurs, however, had big tails, prompting a team of U.S. and Chilean scientists to wonder what would happen if birds had big tails, too. So they attached toilet plunger-like weighted sticks to chickens’ butts and observed the chickens walking like the dinosaurs used to walk (which we recognize from the movie Jurassic Park, right?). I’m still trying to figure out this study’s relevance to my life.

Chickens prefer beautiful people

Researchers trained a bunch of the birds to react to human faces of the opposite sex by pecking a touch-screen. When researchers began to display “more attractive” faces (as rated by human volunteers), the chickens invariably pecked more profusely, indicating a preference for pretty/handsome. What does this mean? I dunno…stay away from chickens if you’re insecure about your looks? There may be a pecker joke in there somewhere, too.

Men are more likely to pick up hitchhikers with bigger breasts

Duh. Like we needed a study to tell us this? Well, a French scientist apparently thought we did. He conducted a field study in which he stationed a young woman wearing an adjustable cup-size bra by the side of a road and observed while 1,200 people stopped to pick her up. Lo, 24% of men motorists offered her a ride when she was a C, versus only 17.79% for the B cup and 14.92 for the A. In a dramatic twist, women drivers showed no preference.

Psychopaths dress for success

A research team at Washington University in St. Louis found that people who demonstrated the “Dark Triad” traits of Machiavellianism, psychopathy and narcissism were more likely to dress in a way that attracts attention. According to the researchers, these DTs deliberately worked on their appearance to create a better first impression, imparting a seductive lure. So all those celebs on best-dressed lists? They’re psychopaths, apparently.

Rich people are greedy, cheating liars

The revelations of the recent election aside, results of a study in the February 2012 PNAS suggest that members of the upper class are more likely to act out of self-interest than those less financially well-endowed. People from different social classes played a computer game and were told they’d win more cash with higher numbers from rolls of the dice. Unbenownst to them, however, the total score could never exceed 12. But when participants related the sum of their rolls, the wealthier gamers were more likely to cheat and report scores higher than 12.

Other studies have shown that rich folks were more likely to cut off other drivers, not stop for pedestrians in crosswalks, and take more candy from a jar after being told what they left would go to children. Asshats.

So there you have it: seven science-based answers to questions we never even thought to ask. You’re welcome.

Given some studies
I can see why science can seem
unbelievable.

So what do you think? I’d love to hear from you!

Read more of my humor here.

Roxanne Jones

Roxanne Jones blogs at www.boomerhaiku.com, a mostly light-hearted, often irreverent look at life as a baby boomer, 17 syllables at a time. When she’s not tapping out haikus, she’s a freelance medical copywriter, enjoys chardonnay and contemplates plastic surgery to get rid of the wattle on her neck.

More Posts - Website

Share this Post:

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses to The velocity of penguin poop and other important scientific studies

  1. January 4, 2017 at 5:20 pm

    “these DTs deliberately worked on their appearance….” I really thought you were referring to the President-elect…oh, but maybe you were!!

    • January 4, 2017 at 5:33 pm

      Dark Triad/Donald Trump–same difference, right?

  2. January 4, 2017 at 2:46 pm

    That stick on chickens’ butts thing sounds like something a bunch of 5th Grade boys would do. LOL!

    • January 4, 2017 at 2:53 pm

      Also, I didn’t know chickens could be such degenerates. What do you call a chicken who is sexually attracted to humans — a humanophile?

      • January 4, 2017 at 4:49 pm

        Well, I guess you could call them degenerate. Others might simply call them discerning…:-)

    • January 4, 2017 at 4:48 pm

      Doesn’t it???

    • January 4, 2017 at 4:50 pm

      My comment “Doesn’t it?” (below) was supposed to be in reply to your comment above, Kathy!

  3. January 4, 2017 at 12:20 pm

    None of these studies was a waste of money. I always wanted to know what a plunger on a chicken derriere would do! LOL

    • January 4, 2017 at 2:35 pm

      So glad to have proveded some answers by sharing these studies, Donna!



User Login

New Release
How to Write and Share Humor
By Donna Cavanagh Published by HumorOutcasts Press

Available in Paperback and Kindle


New Release
Boomer on the Ledge
By Molly Stevens and HumorOutcasts Press

Available in Paperback and Kindle



New Release
Heartly God?
By Wil 3. and Shorehouse Books

Available in Paperback and Kindle






Archives