Political correctness is rampant these days. I predict that it will eventually reach its zenith (or its nadir, depending on your point of view) and we will have to be careful even with the terms we use to describe the mean and awful people of the world. In the near future, we will be using terms such as these:
1. She isn’t evil. She’s conscience-challenged.
2. He isn’t a narcissist. He’s self-inflated.
3. Don’t call him a tyrannical dictator. Call him a force-enhanced statesman.
4. She isn’t a greedy whore. She’s a businesswoman with benefits.
5. He isn’t a mean boss. He’s people management-challenged.
6. She isn’t two-faced. She’s relationship-flexible.
7. He isn’t a thief. He’s an ownership-assessor.
8. She isn’t a workplace backstabber. She’s a company watchperson.
9. He isn’t a sex maniac and she isn’t a nympho. They are lovers of women or men, depending on preference.
10. They aren’t sociopaths. They’re societal rule stretchers.
I’d like to start a group called, The Politically Incorrect, and blurt out whatever is on my mind whenever I feel like speaking it. In the meantime, I’ll keep your list in mind 😉
It is coming full circle in that some of the politically correct soft terms are sometimes worse than the ones with direct meaning.
It serves us right. 😉 😀
Don’t be too surprised if Bill Y gets this wrong but instead of her becoming a pain in the ass, would she be becoming a strain in the donkey?
Yes, or a giver of non-comfort.
You aren’t hilarious…you’re a social commentator with a facetious yet whimsical bent!
Say, . . . you sound like one of them “funny people.”
She is! 😀
And the more facetious and whimsical we get, the more fun we have! 😉
We’re not mockers or humormongers; we’re makers of fun.
And people love us for it! 😉
Hey, I know those people!
That’s funny. So do I! 😉